Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size

Download scientific diagram | Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size (OS) measured across transverse sections and (B) scale size (SS) measured from the focus to the anterior edge. Regression lines depict linear (dashed lines) and logarithmic fits (solid lines). For A, linear: OS = 1.89 + 0.09 · FL, r 2 = 0.94; log: OS = 3.29 · log e FL – 6.32, r 2 = 0.95. For B, linear: SS = –0.12 + 0.07 · FL, r 2 = 0.88; log: SS = 2.38 · log e FL – 6.07, r 2 = 0.89.  from publication: Longitudinal Length Back-Calculations from Otoliths and Scales Differ Systematically in Haddock | Parallel macrostructure analysis of otoliths versus scales was conducted on Georges Bank Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus sampled in spring 2011 to test whether annuli widths of both structures yield comparable estimates of back-calculated length at age. While generally | Otolith, Otolithic Membrane and Fish | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size

JMSE, Free Full-Text

Full article: The enigmatic occurrence, size distribution, and

Schematic thin section of a plaice otolith with indication of the

Christian MÖLLMANN, Professor, Prof. Dr., University of Hamburg, Hamburg, UHH, Institute for Marine Ecosystem and Fisheries Science

Variability in fish size/otolith radius relationships among

Fisheries Oceanography, Aquaculture Journal

7th International Science Symposium & Flats Expo by Bonefish

Otolith morphometry and Fourier transform near-infrared (FT-NIR

Marine Drugs, Free Full-Text

Angling and Conservation of Living Fishy Dinosaurs – Fish, Fishing

Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size