We Need to Let Go of the Bell Curve

Most human activities as well as many disciplines — from physics and biology to linguistics, finance, and computer science — follow a Pareto distribution instead of a “normal” Gaussian curve. In Pareto distributions, a small change in one variable is associated with a large change in another, because it reflects variables multiplied with each other rather than added to each other, as in the normal distribution. This is also referred to as a “power law.” This isn’t an obscure intellectual point, but instead carries serious practical consequences. Because of this error, our approach to most problems is, at best, suboptimal. What does this mean for business leaders? The author presents three practical implications for innovation, risk management, and people.

The Bell Curve Theory, Definition & Examples - Lesson

A Parento Distribution vs. a Gaussian Curve

Applying Mental Models to Building Digital Products - Simple Thread

Use of Bell Curve in Performance Appraisals – Good or Bad? - Empxtrack

In Defense of Being Average

Matteo Venerucci on LinkedIn: We Need to Let Go of the Bell Curve

Article: Bell curve or an 'L' curve? Performance Management once

Adrian Gore warns against a common error with serious implications

The Bell Curve – HijiNKS ENSUE

We need to free ourselves from 'average' thinking — Weird Science lab

The normal distribution – Mathematical Reasoning and Investigation